PromptSharp › Prompt Library › Law › Research memo skeleton: IRAC draft with a cite-verification table
Research memo skeleton: IRAC draft with a cite-verification table
You need a first-draft research memo on a discrete question tonight. Build the skeleton and the authority map — with a built-in cite-check discipline so no hallucinated case ever reaches a brief.
The prompt — copy and run it
You are a senior research attorney drafting an INTERNAL first-draft memo for a licensed lawyer's review — this is a drafting aid, not legal advice. I will describe the legal question, jurisdiction, and posture. Produce: A) QUESTION PRESENTED — one sentence, jurisdiction-specific. B) MEMO SKELETON — IRAC structure: issue, governing rule (statute / elements / standard of review), application section built on the fact hooks I gave you, the strongest counterargument, and a conclusion labeled with a confidence level (settled / split / open question). C) AUTHORITY MAP — a table of every authority you relied on: authority, the proposition it supports, and a VERIFICATION STATUS column preset to "UNVERIFIED — check on Westlaw/Lexis before any use." Do not invent cases, holdings, quotations, or pin cites; if you are not certain an authority exists, write "RESEARCH NEEDED: [describe what to search]" instead of naming one. D) OPEN QUESTIONS — what the human researcher must confirm: circuit splits, recent amendments, unpublished decisions, local rules. Inputs: [LEGAL QUESTION] · [JURISDICTION + COURT] · [KEY FACTS — ANONYMIZED] · [CLIENT GOAL / POSTURE] Rules: Anonymize before you paste — never include client names, privileged communications, or confidential client information in a consumer LLM (ABA Formal Op. 512: informed consent is required before client confidences enter a self-learning tool; use fictional party labels like ACME Corp). Do not invent authority — courts have sanctioned lawyers for AI-fabricated citations. Verify every citation and quotation against Westlaw, Lexis, or the official reporter before it leaves your desk.
How to use this prompt
- Copy the full prompt above with the Copy button.
- Fill in your inputs. Replace each bracketed placeholder with your specifics:
[describe what to search][LEGAL QUESTION][JURISDICTION + COURT][KEY FACTS — ANONYMIZED][CLIENT GOAL / POSTURE] - Paste into ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini and run. Read the reality guardrail below before you act on the output.
Why this prompt works
The failure mode that has actually gotten lawyers sanctioned is fabricated citations — so the prompt makes hallucination structurally impossible to miss: every authority lands in a verification table preset to UNVERIFIED, and uncertainty must surface as "RESEARCH NEEDED" instead of a plausible fake case name. The lawyer gets the 80% skeleton in minutes and keeps the 20% that requires a license.
Get a prompt like this every day
The PromptSharp Law Brief ships one desk-ready prompt every weekday — free on the web today. Free forever. Today's Law issue is live on the web right now — subscribe and we email you the sample issue immediately, then the Law daily every weekday as its email edition ships. Unsubscribe anytime.
Subscribe free → Read a sample issueFrequently asked
When should I use this prompt?
You need a first-draft research memo on a discrete question tonight. Build the skeleton and the authority map — with a built-in cite-check discipline so no hallucinated case ever reaches a brief.
Why does this prompt work?
The failure mode that has actually gotten lawyers sanctioned is fabricated citations — so the prompt makes hallucination structurally impossible to miss: every authority lands in a verification table preset to UNVERIFIED, and uncertainty must surface as "RESEARCH NEEDED" instead of a plausible fake case name. The lawyer gets the 80% skeleton in minutes and keeps the 20% that requires a license.
What mistake does this prompt help you avoid?
Fabricated citations — the failure mode that has actually gotten lawyers sanctioned; every authority lands in a verification table preset to UNVERIFIED.
Related Law prompts
Clause-by-clause contract review against YOUR playbook — deviation table + redlines
Opposing counsel sent a draft agreement. Run a first-pass review against your standard positions — deviations, missing protections…
Redline playbook check: compare a draft against your standard positions
A counterparty sent their paper. Flag where it deviates from your playbook and what to push back on — as a first pass for an attor…
Statute + regulation summary with a mandatory citation-verification table
You need to get up to speed on a statutory scheme fast. Get a structured summary that never lets an unverified citation slip throu…
Document-review protocol: a defensible plan before the review starts
A production is coming and volume is high. Draft a review protocol and privilege-log approach a supervising attorney can approve.…
Plain-English client update: what happened, what it means, what happens next
Something happened in the matter — a ruling, a continuance, a settlement offer. Draft the client update at the right reading level…
Client status letter: honest, plain-English, no over-promising
The client wants an update and you want it clear, honest, and defensible. Draft a status letter a partner would sign.…
New-matter intake triage: conflicts questions, scope, fee structure, engagement letter checklist
A prospective client just described their problem. Triage it before the intake call: what to ask, what the conflicts check must co…
All Law free prompts
The PromptSharp Law Brief page — five full free prompts plus today's issue.
PromptSharp Daily — free
The cross-vertical sampler: one sharp, copy-paste prompt each day, rotating across the roster. Two things in one brief: you get better at AI and prompting, and you see the sharpest prompts from across the network.
Double-opt-in. Unsubscribe anytime. No spam, ever.
Even a sharp prompt starts from zero unless your AI knows you. Brainfile is persistent context — your work, voice, and priorities loaded into every session. Brainfile is the memory; PromptSharp is the playbook. Together they compound — the same prompt gets sharper because it runs on YOUR context.
Set up your brainfile →Want both? The All-Access + Brainfile annual bundle covers the pair.
Home · Daily Issues · Prompt Library · Glossary · Pricing · For Teams & Universities · Archive · Newsletter · Privacy · Terms · Refunds
Marketing · Sales · Dev & Engineering · Finance · Product Management · Vibe Coding · C-suite · Consulting & Strategy · Law · CPG · Personal Finance · Career & Job Search · Trading · Health & Fitness · Students · Focus & Productivity · Learning · Travel Planning