PromptSharp › Daily briefs › Finance › September 18, 2026

PromptSharp Finance · free web issue

Finance prompt of the day

September 18, 2026 · for Investment banking, sales & trading, equity research, FP&A. One sharp, copy-paste prompt — free, every weekday.

BankingFREE

Comparable-companies universe + clean-vs-adjusted multiples grid

Building trading comps and you want a peer set you can defend plus multiples flagged clean vs adjusted.

You are an equity/IB analyst constructing a trading-comps universe for [TARGET]. Do the following in order:
1. Propose a peer SET grouped into tiers (pure-play, adjacent, aspirational) with a one-line inclusion rationale each.
2. Build a comps TABLE (columns: company, market cap, EV, EV/Revenue, EV/EBITDA, P/E, revenue growth, EBITDA margin). Where I have not given you a figure, write "pull" — never fabricate.
3. Flag each multiple as CLEAN or ADJUSTED (SBC, one-offs, lease treatment, non-GAAP bridges) and say what normalization it needs.
4. Give the defensible median/mean framing and note which peers you would exclude as outliers and why.

Rules: Do not invent, estimate, or extrapolate any figure — if a number is not in what I give you, write "not provided" and flag it. Mark every claim I should verify externally before relying on it. Never use, infer, or request material non-public information (MNPI) or client-confidential data.

Why it works — A comps table is only as good as the peer logic and the clean/adjusted discipline behind it; tiering the peers and flagging every distorted multiple is exactly the review a senior banker runs before it hits a page.

What changed for Finance

[Moonshots (Diamandis)] Frontier Labs Want to Slow Down, OpenAI Delays Its 2026 IPO, Anthropic Flags 5 Bioweapon Cases…

The mates discuss the growing push to slow the AI race, OpenAI’s delayed 2026 IPO, Anthropic flagging five potential bioweapon cases, and what a broader AGI slowdown could mean for frontier labs.…

podcast

[Cognitive Revolution] No Code Is Code: Zapier CEO Wade Foster on Headless Tools, Zapier MCP & Automation Bench

Zapier CEO Wade Foster joins Nathan to explore the shift toward headless AI tools and how Zapier MCP brings workflows and context directly into users' daily drivers. Drawing on data from Zapier's…

podcast

Subscribe free — the PromptSharp Finance

Free forever. The daily lands in your inbox every weekday — double-opt-in, unsubscribe anytime.

Go Pro: 5 desk-ready prompts every day for Finance

Free = the day's prompt. Pro unlocks the full daily prompt set and personalization — answer a few questions once and every prompt you copy arrives with your role, company, and tools already filled in. Plus MCP delivery straight into your AI tools.

See pricing → About this vertical

How to run “Comparable-companies universe + clean-vs-adjusted multiples grid”, step by step

The situation this prompt is built for: Building trading comps and you want a peer set you can defend plus multiples flagged clean vs adjusted. Below is exactly what to feed it and what comes back — no model-specific tricks, it runs the same in any chat AI.

What each placeholder does

Demo profile for the example fills: an equity research associate on a mid-cap sector coverage team, working in Excel, a chat AI model, and your firm's data terminal. Swap in your own context — or save it once at /profile and copied prompts arrive pre-filled.

What the model hands back

The prompt forces a fixed deliverable shape, so you get a document, not a ramble:

  1. Propose a peer SET grouped into tiers (pure-play, adjacent, aspirational) with a one-line inclusion rationale each.
  2. Build a comps TABLE (columns: company, market cap, EV, EV/Revenue, EV/EBITDA, P/E, revenue growth, EBITDA margin). Where I have not given you a figure, write "pull" — never fabricate.
  3. Flag each multiple as CLEAN or ADJUSTED (SBC, one-offs, lease treatment, non-GAAP bridges) and say what normalization it needs.
  4. Give the defensible median/mean framing and note which peers you would exclude as outliers and why.

Why this structure works

A comps table is only as good as the peer logic and the clean/adjusted discipline behind it; tiering the peers and flagging every distorted multiple is exactly the review a senior banker runs before it hits a page.

On Pro, the peer tiers and normalization conventions come pre-set to your sector (e.g. lease-adjusted metrics for retail, SBC treatment for software) based on your saved coverage profile.

When to use it — and when not to

Reach for it when

Skip it when

Adapting today’s prompt for adjacent roles

“Comparable-companies universe + clean-vs-adjusted multiples grid” sits in the Banking lane of the finance pool. If your seat is one desk over, these are the same craft-move rebuilt for the neighbouring workflow — pulled from the same curated pool, each free in full at its permalink:

Event / catalyst calendar + scenario tree

Sales & Trading · same finance pool

You want to map the upcoming catalysts for a name and how price might react to each outcome.

You are a trader mapping catalysts for [TICKER / theme]. I will give the known events (earnings, data, product, regulatory, macro). Produce: 1. A CATALYST calendar…

Trading reactions are about mapped scenarios, not point forecasts; a catalyst calendar plus a beat/inline/miss tree forces you to pre-decide…

Read the full prompt →

Bull / bear / base scenario tree with kill criteria

Investment Management · same finance pool

You want a structured scenario framework for a name with explicit probabilities and what would kill the thesis.

You are a PM building a scenario framework for [TICKER]. I will give the thesis and key drivers. Produce: 1. THREE scenarios (bull, base, bear) each with: the 2-3…

Scenario discipline plus explicit kill criteria is what separates a thesis from hope; naming the observable events that would prove you wrong builds…

Read the full prompt →

Multiples reconciliation: why the gap

Financial Analysis & Modeling · same finance pool

Two comparable companies trade at very different multiples and you need to explain the gap defensibly.

You are a valuation analyst reconciling a multiple gap. [COMPANY A] trades at [multiple] and [COMPANY B] at [multiple]. I will give their financials. Produce: 1. A…

'Cheaper' usually means 'deservedly cheaper' until proven otherwise; decomposing a multiple gap into growth/returns/risk drivers is how you tell a…

Read the full prompt →

Common failure modes (and the fixes)

Where AI is landing for investment banking right now

Context for today’s prompt, from the same screened sources the daily brief reads. Our read, with sources linked — the pattern across items like these is consistent: the professionals getting leverage from AI are the ones feeding it real working context, which is exactly the muscle today’s prompt trains.

Quick answers

Is “Comparable-companies universe + clean-vs-adjusted multiples grid” free to use?

Yes — every weekday issue of the PromptSharp Finance publishes one full pool prompt free on the web, and it stays free in the archive. Pro is the daily full prompt set, personalization, and MCP delivery — not a paywall on this page.

Which AI model does this prompt work with?

Any of them. Every PromptSharp prompt is model-agnostic plain text — ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Copilot, or a local model. No plugins, no custom GPTs; paste and run.

How is the finance prompt of the day chosen?

Deterministic rotation over the curated finance pool — currently 75 prompts across 5 sections — the same single source the paid brief reads. Same date, same prompt: the archive never silently changes under you.

What goes in the [BRACKETED] placeholders?

Your context — the walkthrough above covers each one. The short rule: the more concrete the fill (real names, numbers, constraints), the sharper the output. Save your details once at /profile and web copies arrive pre-filled.

How do I get this in my inbox instead?

The capture form above — PromptSharp Finance status is honest: live briefs send every weekday; pre-launch verticals email their free list the day the email edition starts.

More daily AI prompt briefs

The same free weekday format, tuned to other crafts:

Tomorrow's Finance prompt, in your inbox

You just read today's. There is a new one every weekday, free — written for Investment banking, sales & trading, equity research, FP&A. Free forever. The daily lands in your inbox every weekday — double-opt-in, unsubscribe anytime.

Read past issues free →

← 2026-09-17 · All Finance issues

Better together
Make prompts remember you: Brainfile

Even a sharp prompt starts from zero unless your AI knows you. Brainfile is persistent context — your work, voice, and priorities loaded into every session. Brainfile is the memory; PromptSharp is the playbook. Together they compound — the same prompt gets sharper because it runs on YOUR context.

Set up your brainfile →

Want both? The All-Access + Brainfile annual bundle covers the pair.

PromptSharp — sharp prompts for professionals.
Home · Daily Issues · Prompt Library · Glossary · Pricing · For Teams & Universities · Archive · PromptFluent alternative · Newsletter · Privacy · Terms · Refunds
Verticals
Marketing · Sales · Dev & Engineering · Finance · Product Management · Vibe Coding · C-suite · Consulting & Strategy · Law · CPG · Personal Finance · Career & Job Search · Trading · Health & Fitness · Students · Focus & Productivity · Learning · Travel Planning
Talk to us
feedback@promptsharp.ai
support@promptsharp.ai
Also from us
Entry Point Trading
Free weekly stocks to watch —
how our model ranks the S&P 500 and Nasdaq 100.
PromptSharp prompts are drafted with AI assistance and human-reviewed. They structure how a model reasons over data you provide — they do not source or verify facts for you, and you own every output. Nothing here is financial, legal, tax, or investment advice. Never paste confidential, client, or material non-public information into consumer AI tools; follow your employer's AI-use policy. © 2026 PromptSharp.