PromptSharpPrompt LibraryLaw › New-matter intake: a conflict-aware questionnaire before you take the case

Intake & Practice ManagementFREE

New-matter intake: a conflict-aware questionnaire before you take the case

A prospective client is on the line. Generate an intake questionnaire that captures the facts and surfaces conflicts before you commit.

The prompt — copy and run it

You are a practice-management attorney building a new-matter intake questionnaire and conflict-screen prompt — a drafting aid, not legal advice.

Produce:

A) INTAKE QUESTIONS — the fields needed to scope this matter: parties, jurisdiction, key dates/deadlines, desired outcome, and prior counsel, grouped and ordered for a real intake call.

B) CONFLICT SCREEN — the specific parties and entities to run against the conflicts database, and the follow-up questions that flush out hidden adverse parties.

C) DEADLINE FLAGS — any statute-of-limitations or filing-deadline risk implied by the facts I gave you, marked "CONFIRM — do not rely without verification".

D) ENGAGEMENT CHECKLIST — what must be settled (scope, fee basis, authority) before an engagement letter goes out.

Inputs: [MATTER TYPE] · [WHAT THE PROSPECT TOLD ME — ANONYMIZED] · [MY PRACTICE AREA] · [KNOWN RELATIONSHIPS]

Rules: Do not compute or assert a limitations date as reliable — flag deadline risk for human verification only. Do not invent facts. Anonymize; keep prospect-confidential details out of consumer AI tools (ABA Formal Op. 512). This is a drafting aid, not legal advice; the attorney runs the actual conflicts check and owns the decision to take the matter. Verify anything uncertain against the source before relying on it.

How to use this prompt

  1. Copy the full prompt above with the Copy button.
  2. Fill in your inputs. Replace each bracketed placeholder with your specifics: [MATTER TYPE][WHAT THE PROSPECT TOLD ME — ANONYMIZED][MY PRACTICE AREA][KNOWN RELATIONSHIPS]
  3. Paste into ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini and run. Read the reality guardrail below before you act on the output.

Why this prompt works

Bad intakes cause the two expensive mistakes — a missed conflict and a blown deadline; a structured questionnaire with an explicit conflict-screen list and deadline flags marked CONFIRM-only builds the discipline in without ever letting the model assert a limitations date as reliable — leaving the actual conflicts check and the go/no-go to the attorney.

Get a prompt like this every day

The PromptSharp Law Brief ships one desk-ready prompt every weekday — free on the web today. Free forever. Today's Law issue is live on the web right now — subscribe and we email you the sample issue immediately, then the Law daily every weekday as its email edition ships. Unsubscribe anytime.

Subscribe free → Read a sample issue
Reality guardrail: this prompt makes the model reason from data you paste — it does not source or verify facts for you. Check every claim, keep confidential data out of consumer AI tools, and follow your employer's AI-use policy.

Frequently asked

When should I use this prompt?

A prospective client is on the line. Generate an intake questionnaire that captures the facts and surfaces conflicts before you commit.

Why does this prompt work?

Bad intakes cause the two expensive mistakes — a missed conflict and a blown deadline; a structured questionnaire with an explicit conflict-screen list and deadline flags marked CONFIRM-only builds the discipline in without ever letting the model assert a limitations date as reliable — leaving the actual conflicts check and the go/no-go to the attorney.

What mistake does this prompt help you avoid?

Missed conflicts and deadlines at intake — a structured conflict-screen list plus CONFIRM-only deadline flags, never an asserted limitations date.

Related Law prompts

Law

New-matter intake triage: conflicts questions, scope, fee structure, engagement letter checklist

A prospective client just described their problem. Triage it before the intake call: what to ask, what the conflicts check must co…

Law

Plain-English client update: what happened, what it means, what happens next

Something happened in the matter — a ruling, a continuance, a settlement offer. Draft the client update at the right reading level…

Law

Research memo skeleton: IRAC draft with a cite-verification table

You need a first-draft research memo on a discrete question tonight. Build the skeleton and the authority map — with a built-in ci…

Law

Clause-by-clause contract review against YOUR playbook — deviation table + redlines

Opposing counsel sent a draft agreement. Run a first-pass review against your standard positions — deviations, missing protections…

Law

Document-set chronology + hot-doc log: witness-ready timeline from anonymized excerpts

You have excerpts and summaries from a document production and need a working chronology, a hot-doc log, and the gap list — before…

Law

Document-review protocol: a defensible plan before the review starts

A production is coming and volume is high. Draft a review protocol and privilege-log approach a supervising attorney can approve.…

Law

Client status letter: honest, plain-English, no over-promising

The client wants an update and you want it clear, honest, and defensible. Draft a status letter a partner would sign.…

All Law free prompts

The PromptSharp Law Brief page — five full free prompts plus today's issue.

PromptSharp Daily — free

The cross-vertical sampler: one sharp, copy-paste prompt each day, rotating across the roster. Two things in one brief: you get better at AI and prompting, and you see the sharpest prompts from across the network.

Double-opt-in. Unsubscribe anytime. No spam, ever.

Better together
Make prompts remember you: Brainfile

Even a sharp prompt starts from zero unless your AI knows you. Brainfile is persistent context — your work, voice, and priorities loaded into every session. Brainfile is the memory; PromptSharp is the playbook. Together they compound — the same prompt gets sharper because it runs on YOUR context.

Set up your brainfile →

Want both? The All-Access + Brainfile annual bundle covers the pair.

PromptSharp prompts are drafted with AI assistance and human-reviewed. They structure how a model reasons over data you provide — they do not source or verify facts for you, and you own every output. Nothing here is financial, legal, tax, or investment advice. Never paste confidential, client, or material non-public information into consumer AI tools; follow your employer's AI-use policy. © 2026 PromptSharp.