PromptSharp › Prompt Library › Law › New-matter intake: a conflict-aware questionnaire before you take the case
New-matter intake: a conflict-aware questionnaire before you take the case
A prospective client is on the line. Generate an intake questionnaire that captures the facts and surfaces conflicts before you commit.
The prompt — copy and run it
You are a practice-management attorney building a new-matter intake questionnaire and conflict-screen prompt — a drafting aid, not legal advice. Produce: A) INTAKE QUESTIONS — the fields needed to scope this matter: parties, jurisdiction, key dates/deadlines, desired outcome, and prior counsel, grouped and ordered for a real intake call. B) CONFLICT SCREEN — the specific parties and entities to run against the conflicts database, and the follow-up questions that flush out hidden adverse parties. C) DEADLINE FLAGS — any statute-of-limitations or filing-deadline risk implied by the facts I gave you, marked "CONFIRM — do not rely without verification". D) ENGAGEMENT CHECKLIST — what must be settled (scope, fee basis, authority) before an engagement letter goes out. Inputs: [MATTER TYPE] · [WHAT THE PROSPECT TOLD ME — ANONYMIZED] · [MY PRACTICE AREA] · [KNOWN RELATIONSHIPS] Rules: Do not compute or assert a limitations date as reliable — flag deadline risk for human verification only. Do not invent facts. Anonymize; keep prospect-confidential details out of consumer AI tools (ABA Formal Op. 512). This is a drafting aid, not legal advice; the attorney runs the actual conflicts check and owns the decision to take the matter. Verify anything uncertain against the source before relying on it.
How to use this prompt
- Copy the full prompt above with the Copy button.
- Fill in your inputs. Replace each bracketed placeholder with your specifics:
[MATTER TYPE][WHAT THE PROSPECT TOLD ME — ANONYMIZED][MY PRACTICE AREA][KNOWN RELATIONSHIPS] - Paste into ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini and run. Read the reality guardrail below before you act on the output.
Why this prompt works
Bad intakes cause the two expensive mistakes — a missed conflict and a blown deadline; a structured questionnaire with an explicit conflict-screen list and deadline flags marked CONFIRM-only builds the discipline in without ever letting the model assert a limitations date as reliable — leaving the actual conflicts check and the go/no-go to the attorney.
Get a prompt like this every day
The PromptSharp Law Brief ships one desk-ready prompt every weekday — free on the web today. Free forever. Today's Law issue is live on the web right now — subscribe and we email you the sample issue immediately, then the Law daily every weekday as its email edition ships. Unsubscribe anytime.
Subscribe free → Read a sample issueFrequently asked
When should I use this prompt?
A prospective client is on the line. Generate an intake questionnaire that captures the facts and surfaces conflicts before you commit.
Why does this prompt work?
Bad intakes cause the two expensive mistakes — a missed conflict and a blown deadline; a structured questionnaire with an explicit conflict-screen list and deadline flags marked CONFIRM-only builds the discipline in without ever letting the model assert a limitations date as reliable — leaving the actual conflicts check and the go/no-go to the attorney.
What mistake does this prompt help you avoid?
Missed conflicts and deadlines at intake — a structured conflict-screen list plus CONFIRM-only deadline flags, never an asserted limitations date.
Related Law prompts
New-matter intake triage: conflicts questions, scope, fee structure, engagement letter checklist
A prospective client just described their problem. Triage it before the intake call: what to ask, what the conflicts check must co…
Plain-English client update: what happened, what it means, what happens next
Something happened in the matter — a ruling, a continuance, a settlement offer. Draft the client update at the right reading level…
Research memo skeleton: IRAC draft with a cite-verification table
You need a first-draft research memo on a discrete question tonight. Build the skeleton and the authority map — with a built-in ci…
Clause-by-clause contract review against YOUR playbook — deviation table + redlines
Opposing counsel sent a draft agreement. Run a first-pass review against your standard positions — deviations, missing protections…
Document-set chronology + hot-doc log: witness-ready timeline from anonymized excerpts
You have excerpts and summaries from a document production and need a working chronology, a hot-doc log, and the gap list — before…
Document-review protocol: a defensible plan before the review starts
A production is coming and volume is high. Draft a review protocol and privilege-log approach a supervising attorney can approve.…
Client status letter: honest, plain-English, no over-promising
The client wants an update and you want it clear, honest, and defensible. Draft a status letter a partner would sign.…
All Law free prompts
The PromptSharp Law Brief page — five full free prompts plus today's issue.
PromptSharp Daily — free
The cross-vertical sampler: one sharp, copy-paste prompt each day, rotating across the roster. Two things in one brief: you get better at AI and prompting, and you see the sharpest prompts from across the network.
Double-opt-in. Unsubscribe anytime. No spam, ever.
Even a sharp prompt starts from zero unless your AI knows you. Brainfile is persistent context — your work, voice, and priorities loaded into every session. Brainfile is the memory; PromptSharp is the playbook. Together they compound — the same prompt gets sharper because it runs on YOUR context.
Set up your brainfile →Want both? The All-Access + Brainfile annual bundle covers the pair.
Home · Daily Issues · Prompt Library · Glossary · Pricing · For Teams & Universities · Archive · Newsletter · Privacy · Terms · Refunds
Marketing · Sales · Dev & Engineering · Finance · Product Management · Vibe Coding · C-suite · Consulting & Strategy · Law · CPG · Personal Finance · Career & Job Search · Trading · Health & Fitness · Students · Focus & Productivity · Learning · Travel Planning